| |
 |
 |
Mon, November 30, 2009
I think many people in the industry would agree with me that Broadway’s greatest missed marketing opportunity is the way we communicate with our customers. I think it’s safe to say that we don’t say ‘thank you, come again’ to every patron effectively. I think we can all agree that we don’t effectively cross-sell shows on Broadway or on tour outside of the dreaded discount email offers we currently send. Think of the last meeting you sat in where we spoke about the customer feedback we received from ticket buyers on how they felt we could make their Broadway experience better.
My point – our customer communication platform needs help.
With the way we communicate with consumers before, during and after their experience with Broadway, we are in a prime position to take advantage of very big opportunities for our industry if we collectively invest the time and resources to enhancing our efforts towards better communicating with our customers.
Now, I know many on the producing side in the industry will go directly to the point of “how can we improve customer communications when we don’t own our customer data?” While there is truth to the point that not owning your customer data is a stumbling block (I continue to fight on my clients behalf!), this doesn’t mean you can’t have access to using this data by working collectively with the theatre owner (the one’s that own the customer data).
For some reason, this collaboration hasn’t really happened on Broadway as I see it done in other markets. My agency manages somewhere over 1 million customer records (including email addresses) across the globe for our clients, so we are used to the politics that come along with email usage across multiple parties. But, on Broadway, it seems as though the industry keeps getting tripped up in the perpetual argument of “who owns the email addresses of ticket buyers” rather than the larger discussion of “how can we collectively use the email addresses to reach our marketing goals.” Personally, I chalk this lack of collaboration up to egos and power struggles that is a common theme across all markets we work in. I would argue that that this is the single biggest reason it’s taken this long to get a meaningful email communication plan in place across the industry. We need get past this and embrace industry collaboration.
But, to make this collaboration a reality, there is fundamental change needed in how we talk about the topic. I sit (and have sat) in a ton of meetings discussing this issue and I believe if we better structure the discussion and goals of what we all want to accomplish by communicating with our ticket buyers, 2010 will be the year that we can make significant progress on the topic. I submit to you four changes I believe we need to make in how we talk about the topic in order to move an actionable agenda forward on improving overall customer communications in the Broadway industry:
Change #1: We must recognize this is not a conversation about the ownership of email addresses. All too often, this is the focal firestorm that gets attached to the discussion of customer communications. I’m not saying this can’t be a conversation down the road, but for now, if we expect to get anything done we have to put behind us the argument of who “owns the email addresses” and look towards the future of what do we want to say to our customers and when. There is way too much money made on the buying and selling of this customer data – to think the theatre owners would want to give this up is a battle producers are most likely never going to win. Again, this is not unique to Broadway – most venues across the country maintain ownership of the customer data, not the producing entity.
I’ve spoken first hand with the theatre owners and they have very valid arguments as to their position on their maintaining ownership of the data and have collectively outlined a plan through a new program called Audience Rewards that seems very promising as a channel to help with the long-term development of new customers for Broadway. In short, it’s a rewards program aimed to build customer loyalty across all of Broadway and the arts. If nothing else, Audience Rewards represents a single entity bringing together the interests of the three major theatre owners with the cooperation of the two major ticketing systems to create one platform for consolidating customer data and making it actionable for producers. That’s a huge accomplishment in and of itself. I highly encourage you to talk with Josh Lesnik, the President of Audience Rewards, who is outlining a plan that is quite exciting and has huge potential.
Change #2: We must all believe that a comprehensive customer communication strategy is vital to building and maintaining audiences over time. It’s quite common for me to hear from clients, “but they already bought a ticket, shouldn’t we be investing money in reaching new audiences?” Well, I firmly believe in maximizing your existing paid customers experience IS investing in new audiences – you are turning those that see your show into walking ambassadors. Happy customers post their opinions on Facebook, tweet their review to friends and email recommendations to colleagues – every research report ever created for live events will reinforce the value of word-of-mouth and endorsement from colleagues as a critical component when choosing which show to see. The Internet has continued to put word-of-mouth on steroids and it’s the way of the world in a digital marketplace. If you seek to maximize your customers happiness through strong customer communications, even those that didn’t enjoy what’s on stage will be more opt to keep their ‘not-so-good’ opinion to themselves because they felt taken care of. Read most poor reviews on consumer research sites – they are typically customer-service related issues more so than the actual production.
Change #3: We must agree that shows have specific needs and opportunities in talking to their customers that are independent of the larger, broader, industry need of talking to these same customers for a long-term relationship with Broadway. Often when the topic of email marketing comes up for specific shows wanting access to their email addresses, it often goes into a discussion about whether or not we can create repeat buyers to the show. While I’m not saying that we shouldn’t try to gain repeat visits, I think there are far greater opportunities that individual productions should explore.
First, there are a range of what I would call experiential email opportunities. These are emails that tie directly to the brand experience and are sent for a functional purpose to improve or deliver the customer experience. These include pre-trip, post-purchase and post-trip related emails. These are the emails consumers open that could include directions to the theatre, a survey asking for their feedback about their experience, an ecard that could be sent to friends or an invitation to remain connected by becoming a fan of your show on Facebook. From the data we see across the country, these emails typically see open rates of 50%+ which means you have consumers – not just fanatical fans - that are engaged, listening and ready to act assuming you are talking to them in the right context.
After experiential emails, you have what I call earned email opportunities. I think of earned emails as the emails you send to people who have asked to remain connected with your show above and beyond the communication that is involved when seeing the show. This means that you made such a great impression with your show and people want to remain connected with your brand over time that they said, “yes, please keep me connected as I am a fan of your show.” This could be a repeat customer, a first-time customer trying to get know you better or a fanatical fan at your beck and call to help support your show. I think of a shows ongoing newsletter as a great example of earned email impressions.
The last category is what I would label as paid email opportunities. This is pretty self-explanatory. These are emails that you pay an advertising or premium cost for to have sent to potential ticket buyers who did not specifically opt-in to get messages from you. I think this is one place that has not been scrutinized enough and we should take this next year to put a much larger focus on this. There are literally millions of emails sent (and lot’s of dollars spent) each week – but, if you were to survey the industry to know response rates, open rates and overlap between email programs there would be a lot of questions unanswered.
Change #4: We all need to work together or we will be having this same exact conversation for years to come. To make email communication successful will involve participation by all parties. If everyone defined their marketing goals of what they want to get out of improving customer communication, I’m quite sure we can all stitch together a plan of who is responsible for what touch point. Shows have their specific goals to drive revenue, up-sell ancillary revenue opportunities and to build a communication platform that extends to the future life of the production on tour. The theatre owners want their theatre’s full for many years to come, so have a vested interest in building long-term, sustainable relationships with Broadway ticket buyers. Everyone has a vested interest to improve customer communications – but, without a shared vision, no progress will be made.
So, there you have it. I know there are a lot of differing opinions on the topic and I would love to hear what all of you have to say. We will be hosting an event at our office this coming Thursday at 8:30am which will bring together about 100 folks in the industry to talk about the topic of customer communications. You can submit for an RSVP and will be notified if there is availability. http://www.situationinteractive.com/rsvp.php
Sun, June 08, 2008
Considering we are an industry that sends a ridiculous amount of email to the same people every day – the topic of subject lines is a very important one.
According to a new study by Alchemy Worx, “open rates climb when the subject lines are in the 50-character range or 80-character range. But, perhaps counter intuitively, they fall in the middle when the length is 60 or 70. Research culled from 250 million messages sent over the past two years, with 660 different subject lines, has led them to believe that a 50-character subject line touting a ‘powerful’ offer is appealing (30% off Spring Getaway flights to Florida on Delta). And a longer 80-character-plus line describing a newsletter in enticing fashion works (Find out Secrets to Spice up your Barbecue this weekend and all Summer Long and enter to win a New Weber Grill.) Somehow, in the 60- to-70-character middle, the subject line is either too long or not long enough.”
As for the ‘why’ – they believe it could be that the longer the message, the more opportunities you have to hit key selling points. Personally, I think your focus should always be getting the value proposition in the email out as quickly, understandably and efficiently as possible.
We are currently in the process of creating an agency based email efficiency report, headed by Lisa Cecchini in our office, looking closer at how, where, why and when people engage in email marketing. Should be ready this summer.
In the meantime, read the following story for more information.
Read On
Thu, August 24, 2006
So what is the best day to send out email blasts? A few months back we saw one report say Friday. A few weeks back, we found another study say Saturday. Around the holidays this past year, we said Monday’s may be the best day. So, we understand if you think some of this is confusing.
To add to the confusion, here is yet another report that gives more insight on the best days to send out your email blasts. This report is based on user preferences rather than performance statistics. I do like this report because it separates out business-to-business versus business-to-consumer email preferences which is helpful. Broadway ticket offers and a pharmaceutical supplies email list shouldn’t be measured in the same category. Here’s some interesting point from the report:
- Preferences peak for receipt on Wednesdays (26 percent) and Fridays (31 percent). The Wednesday delivery allows consumers to plan their weekends and drives them to shopping experiences. E-mail received on Fridays leads into the weekend and hits consumers when the weekend is top of mind. The low points for receiving B2C e-mail occur on Saturdays and Sundays.
- Monthly is the frequency of choice for consumers receiving newsletters. Thirty-six percent said they want monthly e-mail; 21 percent would like e-mail every other week; and 17 percent like weekly e-mail.
There’s the research – now you make the call. :)
Read more.
Fri, August 04, 2006
According to a new report, more than one in three consumers mistakenly report e-mail that they have signed up for as "junk" or "spam" mail. This could be a major problem for Broadway show lists that do a lot of mailings. This just stresses the importance of making sure you keep a good relationship with your email subscribers and that you don't import email addresses from those that are not clearly aware they are joining your list. The headache of being blacklisted from key ISP's isn't worth it.
Click here to read more.
Mon, April 17, 2006
It's a very important topic and one that the theater world needs to address as we continue to rely on email marketing to drive ticket sales.
Consider the fact that a typical show can send over 500,000 emails before first performance. Imagine if a change in your subject line yielded a 5% increase in emails being opened? That's an extra 25,000 more people viewing your email. That's significant revenue.
We found this interesting interview with online copywriting guru Nick Usborne, a leading authority on the subject of writing for the web. The most basic mistakes he sees are as follows:
- Using words that cause the email to be filtered.
(We better hope "SAVE" or "DISCOUNT" isn't a highly filtered word. Only the email providers (i.e., Playbill, Theatermania, etc.) would be able to tell us. Otherwise, many of our email blasts may be ending up in junk filters.
- Being too promotional.
- Failure to be interesting.
There is a ton of interesting insight in this article. If you are on the front lines of developing email marketing campaigns, we would highly encourage you to read this article in full.
Click here to read more.
Wed, March 29, 2006
Well, it seems Friday is (for now) according to a new report.
"The study finds Friday to be the best day to send e-mail. The past two quarters show a tendency for higher open and click rates on Friday. Tuesday gets the second-highest open rate, with Thursday earning the second-highest click through rates."
| E-Mail Read and Click-Through Rates by Day of the Week, Q4 2005 |
| |
Sent |
Open (%) |
Click (%) |
| Sunday |
5,011,265 |
14.7 |
3.5 |
| Monday |
23,303,132 |
14.3 |
2.7 |
| Tuesday |
19,891,083 |
20.8 |
3.7 |
| Wednesday |
22,220,590 |
19.5 |
3.6 |
| Thursday |
21,565,988 |
20.0 |
3.7 |
| Friday |
16,313,851 |
21.0 |
4.0 |
| Saturday |
3,493,336 |
13.0 |
2.5 |
| Source: eROI Inc., 2006 |
If you really look at the data, Friday isn't producing that much better than other weekdays.
But, what we found surprising, is the very large drop off in response rates on Monday's compared to the other weekdays. Tuesday - Fridays averaged about 20% of consumers opening the email. Monday, was only 14%.
"The day descent has been a moving target every quarter," said Ryan Buchanan, president and CEO of eROI. "What we are seeing in this trend is that business-to-consumer e-mails... performed better on Friday."
Click here to read more.
Mon, February 13, 2006
Here are some key statistics to keep in mind when measuring the success of email blasts.
According to a June 2005 report from Doubleclick, here are some benchmarks for email marketing that will help put a perspective on "acceptable" returns for your mailings.
- The average open rate (30.2%)
- The average click-through rate (7.9%)
- The average click-to-purchase rate (4.1%)
- The average orders-per-email-delivered rate (0.26%)
We think the standard theatre email blasts will outperform the benchmarks provided above but you can be sure these statistics will hold true when you begin to approach a non-traditional theatre base.
Click here to read the complete report (.pdf).
Wed, February 08, 2006
We are not meaning to sound the alarm here but if AOL and Yahoo have their way, commercial email blasts will likely take a price bump upwards.
Here is an excerpt from the article:
"The two companies are working with Goodmail Systems, an e-mail certification company that determines “good” e-mail senders from “bad” e-mail senders, with a specific focus on marketers and commercial mailers.
Goodmail certifies legitimate senders and charges them a per-message fee in exchange to get them through spam filters. Goodmail takes into account the legitimacy of the business, whether the proposed receiver has opted-in to receive messages, and that the sender has permission to send messages. The company charges an accreditation fee and a per-message fee of less than a penny; the message fees are split with the e-mail providers."
We are not sure if this initiative will really ever take off but it's been getting a lot of press recently so we feel you should all at least be aware.
Click here to read the full story on Forbes.com.
Fri, October 14, 2005
Are you sitting down for this one?
One fifth of permission-based e-mails did not reach the inbox during the first half of 2005, according to a new deliverability study from Return Path.
That's 20% of email that is sent to people WHO ACTUALLY WANT TO RECEIVE YOUR EMAILS (think discount ticket offer emails) never actually get them.
Why? Spam filters and overzealous ISP's.
According to the report, "those with the highest delivery rates for legitimate mail included Mac.com, which filtered or blocked only eight percent, and Earthlink, which blocked 10 percent. At the other end of the spectrum are Gmail (39 percent blocked), MSN (33 percent) and Hotmail (32 percent)."
This really drives home the point that the credibility and the long-term behavior of the owner of the email list (i.e., Playbill, Theatermania, etc.) is incredibly important.
Click here to read the complete story.
Sun, September 18, 2005
First, the bad news.
In short, fewer of our messages are reaching our prospective customers. People are becoming so overwhelmed with email that the number of emails they are opening is actually decreasing.
In short, they attribute this to three primary reasons:
1) Smarter spam filters 2) Maturation of email lists 3) People receiving a greater volume of email
The good news is that conversion rates among those that open the emails remains steady.
Click here to read more from the study.
Sat, September 10, 2005
Next time you look at the sales reports and see the incredible success of your Playbill email blast, consider this:
"Research by Forrester found that consumers place more trust in Web sites and e-mails they signed up for than in newspaper, magazine, radio or television ads."
Here's a helpful article that walks you through how to develop successful email marketing campaigns with your email lists.
Click here to learn more.
Sat, July 30, 2005
Before you send that next email blast out for one of your productions, you should read the following article. It goes through some of the do's and don'ts in preparing an email blast.
"An effective design should do more than look nice. It should support the business message and objective. Correctly executed, a picture really is worth a thousand words."
Click here for the complete story.
Sun, July 10, 2005
Yeah, everyone loves email marketing. While I'm a big fan, I realize that the email marketing biz is in some trouble. Delivery changes, consumer demand for better control of their inbox and continued government pressure for better spam guidelines will continue to shake up this marketing medium.
With that said, here is an interesting report we found.
"E-mail list pricing could drop as much as 25 percent in the next three to six months because of changes in the way service providers handle HTML e-mails that will cut into deliverability rates, Worldata Inc. said yesterday."
Click here for the complete story.
1
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|